<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=AnewGoResident</id>
	<title>AnewGoResident - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=AnewGoResident"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?title=AnewGoResident&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-06T13:37:29Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.45.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?title=AnewGoResident&amp;diff=1423&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>imported&gt;Import: Imported current content</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?title=AnewGoResident&amp;diff=1423&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-01-28T11:54:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Imported current content&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
An [[AnewGoResident]] has the right to vote in [[AnewGo]] elections, but does NOT have the right to pass [[AnewGoLaw]]. If they do they will need to be referred to [[AnewGoCourt]] and put their defense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They can apply for an [[AnewGoBankAccount]].&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Is this correct? Aren&amp;#039;t all [[AnewGoResident]]s members of the [[AnewGoCongress]]?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Indeed, shouldn&amp;#039;t all [[AnewGoLaw]]s have to pass through the [[AnewGoCongress]] first? And then be open to challenge in the [[AnewGoCourt]]?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This sound like issues that belong on a different page(s). What pages should this discussion be move to? Please feel free to move it to a more appropriate page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible that, in discussion that grows organically, to be pedantically bound to a particluar page may be an inappropriate expectation. Hence [[AnewGoLaw]] is gazetted in [[AnewGoLaw]], there Congress members can read and vote and refer to [[AnewGoCongress]] or the particlur Law subpage for more discussion. [[AnewGoCongress]] members, at the moment is the same as the set of [[AnewGoCitizen]]s&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
I feel it is dangerous to allow someone who has actively chosen not to be a citizen to engage in the developement of [[AnewGoLaw]]. Think about it, why not be a citizen, if not, they are partly positioning themselves outside of [[AnewGo]]. It is their own choice. So it is recognised that these people exist and treated accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Remember, theoretically these pages are open to all humanity with computer access, if people decide not to agree with the aims of [[AnewGo]] but either waste time, or actively sabotage and undermine, this is not helpful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hence the [[AnewGoErasureAct]] will need to be employed&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
So, there is currently one [[AnewGoResident]]? The [[StarPilot]]? Is this out to create two levels of [[AnewGo]] membership? One for signatories, and a second level for those that participate, but do not sign up?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;Fraid so. [[StarPilot]] defined it himself by refusing to sign, but still participating. There are many residents in nations who are not citizens of the nation they are in.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  That&amp;#039;s fine. I just wanted to get a clarification on what an [[AnewGoResident]] was. Thanks==== Besides, one can always sign the [[AnewGoCitizenRegistry]] if one decides to.&lt;br /&gt;
====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And what is this [[AnewGoErasureAct]]?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We do need to be somewhat pedantical. This gives us a somewhat better then simple chance to find what we are looking for, and we do need to employ some methodology as to the placement of knowledge/information/discussions. This is why things need to be refactored occasionally. An item may have outgrown its original placement and belongs elsewhere. We simply shouldn&amp;#039;t get stuck on determining the catagorization of everything. ---StarPilot&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
This is the second time I have found the word &amp;quot;refactoring&amp;quot; used in [[WikiWorld]] by [[StarPilot]].  What exactly does this mean?  Is it akin to normalization of databasen?  Could someone post a standard procedure for refactoring?  Thankx, [[LorraineLee|Lori|]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Refactoring is just moving info or page details to a different location.&lt;br /&gt;
*In iterative object oriented design, refactoring is breaking a large complicated object class into smaller, simpler classes.  I suppose that is somewhat analogus to the refactoring process, but less formal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>imported&gt;Import</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>