<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=CommentPeriod</id>
	<title>CommentPeriod - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=CommentPeriod"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?title=CommentPeriod&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-06T15:24:54Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.45.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?title=CommentPeriod&amp;diff=1522&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>imported&gt;Import: Imported current content</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?title=CommentPeriod&amp;diff=1522&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-01-28T11:54:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Imported current content&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I believe we need a [[CommentPeriod]] to give everyone time to review changes in the Law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I made a new proposal based on [[StarPilot]]&amp;#039;s ideas. The old one is below for reference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are two proposals for discussion. [[ConsensusByDefault]] is not yet invoked (but if you agree to this change, sign your agreement, and [[ConsensusByDefault]] will be invoked later):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Proposal 1: [[CommentPeriod]]&lt;br /&gt;
===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whereas it is desirable that,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
that all changes receive adequate discussion,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
that confidence be maintained that the Law of [[AnewGo]] represent in some form the Will of the Citizens:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) No law shall be changed without giving at least one week of notice to the community. Vetoing a law counts as a &amp;quot;change&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Proposal 2: Formality Act of May 2003&lt;br /&gt;
===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Summary:&lt;br /&gt;
==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The category [[CategoryAnewGoAct]] &amp;#039;&amp;#039;is&amp;#039;&amp;#039; the Law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Proposed changes in their comment period go in [[CategoryAnewGoProposedAct]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Text of Act:&lt;br /&gt;
==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whereas it is desirable that,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Law is clearly distinguished from discussion,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All citizens be appraised of impending changes to the Law,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All citizens should be able to easily find every Law which is in force:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) Any page with an Act, in force or proposed, shall have the text of the Act in a section at the top of the page, and then a divider. Nothing after the divider shall be considered Law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) Any page with an Act currently in force shall have the word &amp;quot;CategoryAnewGoAct&amp;quot; near the bottom.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any page with an Act or change to Law which is submitted to the community as per [[CommentPeriodLaw]] shall have the word &amp;quot;CategoryAnewGoProposedAct&amp;quot; neat the bottom.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any page which mentions either the word [[CategoryAnewGoAct]] or [[CategoryAnewGoProposedAct]] in passing, but which is not an Act or a proposed Act, must state &amp;quot;This page is not an Act.&amp;quot; in the first paragraph at the top of the page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3) The Law of [[AnewGo]] shall be exactly the first sections of pages in [[CategoryAnewGoAct]] which do not say &amp;quot;This page is not an Act&amp;quot; in the first paragraph.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Discussion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[StarPilot]], I hadn&amp;#039;t thought to just use categories, that&amp;#039;s a good idea, thanks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[CommentPeriod]] proposed law says, in the simplest way possible, that there is a comment or grace period in between changes to the Law and their adoption.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Formality Act institutes [[CategoryAnewGoAct]] and [[CategoryAnewGoProposedAct]] and makes their use compulsory. It also creates a section at the top of each Act page with the actual text of the Act. I think that is necessary for clarity. The Act text may still be copied below, in the discussion section which is on the same page, and discussed with inserted comments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- [[BayleShanks]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== the old proposal (for reference only)&lt;br /&gt;
===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is a proposal for discussion. [[ConsensusByDefault]] is not yet invoked (but if you agree to this change, sign your agreement, and [[ConsensusByDefault]] will be invoked later):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Votes For&lt;br /&gt;
====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Votes Against&lt;br /&gt;
====&lt;br /&gt;
*StarPilot 2003-05-23&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The old proposal:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(to be relocated to [[CommentPeriodLaw]] if passed)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whereas it is desirable that,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) all citizens be appraised of impending changes to the Law,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) that all changes receive adequate discussion,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3) that confidence be maintained that the Law of [[AnewGo]] represent in some form the Will of the Citizens:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All discussion must be relocated immediately from [[AnewGoLaw]]. After this time, it shall be illegal to change the page [[AnewGoLaw]] or any Law linked from it unless a link to the proposed change has been posted on the page [[ProposedLaw]] for at least one week, and the change has been approved according to the legal process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Only that which is posted on or linked from [[AnewGoLaw]] is Law. Changes to [[AnewGoLaw]] which disrespect this [[CommentPeriod]] are null and void.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each page with Law on it shall have the Law in a section at the top of the page, and then a divider. Nothing after the divider shall be considered Law. Only the Law may not be changed without a [[CommentPeriod]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Discussion on the old proposal:&lt;br /&gt;
===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that approval or disapproval of a proposed change may be made by any method, including [[ConsensusByDefault]]. Right now, &amp;quot;the legal process&amp;quot; is [[ConsensusByDefault]]. So, to make a new law, you post the change on [[ProposedLaw]], and then a week later, if no one disagrees, you may link it from [[AnewGoLaw]], and then it is Law. To veto an existing Law, you serve notice of your veto on [[ProposedLaw]], and then a week later, you remove the Law in question from [[AnewGoLaw]], and then it is not Law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- [[BayleShanks]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That went right over my head, today. Just one of those days...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, to make a new [[AnewGoAct]], or protest an existing [[AnewGoAct]], one has to post a link to it here. Then in a week, one links or unlinks it on [[AnewGoLaw]]?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where does [[AnewGoLaw]] page get it&amp;#039;s authority? I thought that was a function of [[AnewGoCongress]]? To either have or to link all existing [[AnewGoActs]]?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Second, to protest an existing [[AnewGoAct]], one simply files a complaint about it with [[AnewGoCourt]]. So are you proposing to change it to add unlinking it from the [[AnewGoLaw]] page and then filing the protest? Otherwise, you are allowing anyone to unlink anything, and the act of unlinking is the signal that the [[AnewGoAct]] is no long in force.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On further thought, you want to move the mess that is effectively [[AnewGoCongress]] to here? And then split subsequent comments? I think that is a bad idea. The community is served best when all comments about a proposed [[AnewGoAct]] is located with that Act. In general, Acts should be given their own page. Yes, I think that works best. We just need a central point that gives us a list of the current proposed acts. And for that, a [[CategoryAnewGoProposedAct]] should suffice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I vote against this [[CommentPeriod]] as I understand it at this time. (2003-05-23)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: I&amp;#039;m not against a &amp;quot;grace period&amp;quot;. That is an excellent suggestion. However, I am against all this linking and unlinking and by design splitting of comments and discussion on an [[AnewGoAct]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
---StarPilot&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
====AnewGo Functionality Section&lt;br /&gt;
====&lt;br /&gt;
*CategoryAnewGoProposedAct&lt;br /&gt;
*AnewGoToDo: Review this topic.&lt;br /&gt;
*AnewGoToDo: Vote.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>imported&gt;Import</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>