https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=DearDiary.2006-12-25 2026-05-06T14:08:55Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.45.1 https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?title=DearDiary.2006-12-25&diff=2481&oldid=prev 2026-01-28T11:54:25Z

<p>Imported current content</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>[[DearDiary]],<br /> <br /> THE SHORTEST DAY IS PAST as we celebrate God born in Man.<br /> <br /> Joy to the world!<br /> <br /> Evolution is not random, and it is beyond our understanding. The<br /> fruits of Evolution exhibit engineering that renders human endeavor<br /> crude and primitive.<br /> <br /> Mammals bask IN THE DELUSION OF being INTELLIGENT beings.<br /> <br /> Intelligence is social, beyond the body. far from the instance of<br /> inception yet intimately connected to it.<br /> <br /> It is a semantic argument, evolution is undeniable as is intelligent<br /> design. There is no controversy just the delusion that we can choose<br /> one over the other because we are intelligent.<br /> <br /> Today science exposes the quantum mechanics of inception triggered by<br /> a single atom. Only religion, currently, illuminates the determining<br /> cultural intelligence.<br /> <br /> Jesus, etc., live through me, I pray.<br /> <br /> And may Love rule.<br /> <br /> We are children of rapists and murderers as only the ruthless have<br /> survived. If we believe that natural selection is dominant, then<br /> there is no hope for us. 99% of human diversity has been murdered by<br /> humans.<br /> <br /> Yet, we live The Good Life. The evidence suggests, that social<br /> intelligence dominates natural selection.<br /> <br /> Thank God.<br /> <br /> Science does not mix with religion in my book, because Science should<br /> not include that which is beyond our understanding.<br /> <br /> It is important Science not be a Religion and pretend to understand<br /> what it does not understand, e.g. evolution. Science can describe<br /> lower (local) dimensions, but a new paradigm is need before it can<br /> include higher (global) dimensions which are actual, but made of memes<br /> embodied anywhere and everywhere. Our social sciences, today, are<br /> volatile and suggestive, predictive to 11%, 5%, and 3% significance<br /> unlike true science or religion which is 99.99999999999999%<br /> predictive.<br /> <br /> Our philosophy must include both science and religion if we are whole<br /> people, but to love science, to me, is to distinguish it.<br /> <br /> Happy Solstice!<br /> <br /> Jim</div>

imported>Import