<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=GroupThink</id>
	<title>GroupThink - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=GroupThink"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?title=GroupThink&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-06T14:52:37Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.45.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?title=GroupThink&amp;diff=1707&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>imported&gt;Import: Imported current content</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?title=GroupThink&amp;diff=1707&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-01-28T11:54:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Imported current content&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Group think&amp;quot; is the lowest common denominator of shared Personal [[Truth]].  It is the opposite of the [[CollectiveIntelligence]], it is collective stupidity.&lt;br /&gt;
%%%&lt;br /&gt;
%%%&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
%%%&lt;br /&gt;
My question is how does one know or become aware of being in the lowest common denominator.%%%&lt;br /&gt;
Also, a few laughed at individuals have made incredible intelligent changes in history.%%%&lt;br /&gt;
%%%&lt;br /&gt;
I think the &amp;quot;Group think&amp;quot; propaganda thing is a conspiracy to satisfy all those who thought they knew better.%%%&lt;br /&gt;
The bottom line is that &amp;quot;They&amp;quot; who would gain did with out pain, and can blame someone else for their game. But some how those that were apposed feel &amp;quot;just cause&amp;quot; for the news for which they knew before it all &amp;quot;begain&amp;quot;.%%%&lt;br /&gt;
%%%&lt;br /&gt;
--KaJoTra&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
[[GroupThink]] is nothing more then memes at [[War]]. The bits go in, theories (new memes) are made, and then they fight with any conflicting memes in [[ThoughtSpace]]. If they gain more [[ThoughtSpace]] then any other opposed meme, it becomes [[GroupThink]] by definitation, doesn&amp;#039;t it?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The only time [[GroupThink]] is considered dangerous is when a person has a different meme (that is more correct for a situation the then current dominant one), and that person decides to not spread their meme, for fear of repercussions (social, business, political, legal, etc).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We are, by nature, [[GroupThink]]ers. That is part of our social make up. If we didn&amp;#039;t [[GroupThink]], larger societies or communities couldn&amp;#039;t form. There are times we all &amp;quot;keep our mouth shut&amp;quot;, even though we know &amp;quot;better&amp;quot;. That is just part of the price we pay to be members of a particular society.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
---StarPilot&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AdministratiumAtom]] is an instance of groupthink.  Groups tend to be less effective than individuals but are not necessarily so.  It is also true that strong &amp;quot;leaders&amp;quot;, like Hitler and Bush, manipulate groupthink to their advantage.  Political correctness is a type of groupthink as well. --JimScarver&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Related links:&lt;br /&gt;
* 2004-07-09 [[|http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/09/senate.intel.ap/index.html Report]] blames [[GroupThink]] for CIA failures on Iraq&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>imported&gt;Import</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>