<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=ImportLaw</id>
	<title>ImportLaw - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=ImportLaw"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?title=ImportLaw&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-06T14:56:17Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.45.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?title=ImportLaw&amp;diff=1737&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>imported&gt;Import: Imported current content</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?title=ImportLaw&amp;diff=1737&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-01-28T11:54:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Imported current content&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;To invoke [[ImportLaw]] is to propose to import an existing Legal Document (with appropriate modifications) from what the proposer considers to be best practise of the originating geographical state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once it is voted in [[AnewGoCongress]] it can assume [[AnewGoLaw]]. It is the [[AnewGoImportLawAct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Votes: For: [[AnewGo]] 2003-5-11, [[KenSchry]] 2003-5-11. Against: [[BayleShanks]] 2003-5-19, [[StarPilot]] 2003-05-20)&lt;br /&gt;
* So, most likely you mean we&amp;#039;ll be adopting parts of the American constitution and other countries laws, and implemant them to ours?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  --&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Comments: First, it should be [[AnewGoImportAct]]. There is no need to have the word LAW in the title. Especially when all laws can be objected to, and sent to [[AnewGoCourt]] for an examination, discussion, and community ruling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I&amp;#039;m not so sure about the American Consistution, I have not seen many redeeming features there.&lt;br /&gt;
but if we find a good practise, yes lets consider it&amp;#039;s inclusion with appropriate modifications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why does this need to be voted on? All we are saying is that we are allowed to adopt other States&amp;#039; laws verbatim. There is nothing to prevent us from doing so without this, right?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I voted against because I think this law is unnecessary.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Humm... Are you so strongly against this issue you are going to bring it up in [[AnewGoCourt]] if this this passes? (Current count is 2 for, 1 against. Simple Majority has it still &amp;#039;passing&amp;#039;) Or are you going to abide by the group vote, however it goes?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although, now that you mention it, why would [[AnewGoGovernment]] need this? An [[AnewGoCitizen]] could merely copy the law from wherever it was, verbatim, and propose it to [[AnewGoCongress]]. So... Let&amp;#039;s tie that vote, changing it to 2 For, 2 Against. It is unnecessary.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--StarPilot&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>imported&gt;Import</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>