<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=InformationAsaSubstance</id>
	<title>InformationAsaSubstance - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=InformationAsaSubstance"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?title=InformationAsaSubstance&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-06T14:13:54Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.45.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?title=InformationAsaSubstance&amp;diff=1741&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>imported&gt;Import: Imported current content</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?title=InformationAsaSubstance&amp;diff=1741&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-01-28T11:54:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Imported current content&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Our poor brains need analogies to grasp some concepts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Information is a meta concept.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Treating it as something tangible can help us to understand it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
In our brains we have hardwired components for interactions with people.  We recognise eyes, faces, and even model other people in our minds.  This has a deep evolutionary history.  When we developed wider concepts we often used personification as a bridge.  That river is described as &amp;#039;old man river&amp;#039;, the seasons of the year seen as a person growing older and being born.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
My poor brain finds little analogy from information to substance.  When substance has form, it seems to have information, but substance by itself appears to be an [[InformationVacuum]].  [[InformationVacuum]] may be a bad analogy, since nature abhors substance vacuum but seems to favor [[InformationVacuum]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  Bad Example. Nature doesn&amp;#039;t care, one way or the other, about vacuums. We often think Nature does, but that&amp;#039;s due to using just one data point in the full set. We are down in a gravity well, with lots of matter banging about against each other down here. That business (and friction) creates the &amp;#039;High concentration to low concentration&amp;#039; behavior we think is the guiding rule of this lone data point. The truth is, Nature has swept up our matter into a nice, discreet dust bunny that she may do something about, eventually. Before that, we were a nice diffuse cloud... now all that space we used to be in is a vacuum. See? With there being more Vacuum then Matter, and with Nature clumping Matter together, we would be better off saying, Nature prefers to make as big a vacuum as Nature can. --StarPilot, at it again. :-D&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Money is information about human value as energy is the information about the basic nature of our universe.  Information as energy is substance by e=mc^2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  Money is the [[HumanAnimal]]&amp;#039;s most concentrated effort at [[ExtremeCollaboration]]. What an accomplishment, eh? (Actually, I say yes and no.) --StarPilot&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>imported&gt;Import</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>