<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=InformationNature</id>
	<title>InformationNature - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=InformationNature"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?title=InformationNature&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-06T14:22:48Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.45.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?title=InformationNature&amp;diff=1748&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>imported&gt;Import: Imported current content</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?title=InformationNature&amp;diff=1748&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-01-28T11:54:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Imported current content&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
There are information explosions that happen when order emerges from&lt;br /&gt;
chaos.  These can happen in any dimension of organization.  Our universe&lt;br /&gt;
is one.  These tend to go toward equilibrium, cooling, slowing.  The&lt;br /&gt;
condense into organization on larger scales of size and complexity as&lt;br /&gt;
they cool, where the complexity is too great chaos emerges becoming&lt;br /&gt;
random noise where order can emerge and the cycle begins again.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Size and time are relative so the process is continuous and we never&lt;br /&gt;
reach absolute zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The magic of creativity of evolutionary systems makes it impossible to&lt;br /&gt;
determine if our information era will ever end.  We know is starts with&lt;br /&gt;
the unseem vacuum energy which is the noise of the prior information&lt;br /&gt;
cycle, recycled, to manifests ourselves and our world.&lt;br /&gt;
------&lt;br /&gt;
In information physics dimensions are the same as&lt;br /&gt;
properties.   In the quantum, the entities are composed of discrete&lt;br /&gt;
differences in some number of dimensions.  Of course these differences&lt;br /&gt;
need not manifest our perception of the dimensions of space or time, necessarily.  But it&lt;br /&gt;
turns out that interactions do manifest themselves ar being space&lt;br /&gt;
(light, distance, time independence, energy) like or time (particle,&lt;br /&gt;
point, mass) like, discriminating our perception of the dimensionality&lt;br /&gt;
of our universe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no such thing as nothing in any number of dimensions.&lt;br /&gt;
Space is made of energy in three dimensions approximately, but it is a bent.&lt;br /&gt;
The furthest point in every direction we see the  big bang.&lt;br /&gt;
There is no outside of the expansion of spacetime, only the inside is&lt;br /&gt;
manifest.&lt;br /&gt;
Space bends and flows as mass dictates independent of any dimensional grid.&lt;br /&gt;
The interior of a black hole is MUCH vaster than it&amp;#039;s exterior dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
Atoms are at least four dimensional in that they also exhibit inner&lt;br /&gt;
dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Space is not like electro-magnetic waves, instead it manifests&lt;br /&gt;
electro-magnetic waves and is composed of neutrinos and electro-magnetic&lt;br /&gt;
waves.  Calling them waves is a bit misleading as they are not waves or&lt;br /&gt;
particles.  Electrons of like spin exchange momentum in discrete amounts&lt;br /&gt;
manifesting in aggregate what we call the electric field, but it is all&lt;br /&gt;
interaction of pairs of electrons, not little influences of one electron&lt;br /&gt;
on many others.  Electrons of opposite spin do not interact.  They&lt;br /&gt;
happily occupy the same state (of transmit each other rather than&lt;br /&gt;
reflecting).  Spin &amp;#039;up&amp;#039; state space, and &amp;#039;down&amp;#039; space are discriminated&lt;br /&gt;
independently.  If the up and down are balanced we say there is no&lt;br /&gt;
magnetic field.  If they are unbalanced, we say there is a magnetic&lt;br /&gt;
field.  What is actually happening in the quantum is that up space and&lt;br /&gt;
down space are discriminated independently, manifesting the same amount&lt;br /&gt;
of space is total, but more between like spin (poles) manifesting&lt;br /&gt;
repulsion, and none between unlike spin (poles).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most primitive property, spin, is unlike space&lt;br /&gt;
or time.  It is not like anything spinning either, it is more like right&lt;br /&gt;
or left handedness.  Its value is binary from the information&lt;br /&gt;
perspective that is all that is relevant.  The second property, charge,&lt;br /&gt;
is also not like space or time, in the information perspective it takes&lt;br /&gt;
integer values of the Plank action.   The third property is similar,&lt;br /&gt;
color, it takes on independent integer values.  Independent of any&lt;br /&gt;
meaning the basic properties manifest discrete differences from&lt;br /&gt;
nothingness that are propagated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Propagation is by reflection or transmission of discrete differences,&lt;br /&gt;
100% or -100%, there is no continuous variation over time.  Like spins&lt;br /&gt;
reflect, manifesting the events that discriminate space and time, unlike&lt;br /&gt;
spins transmit, propagating through each other unaffected.  Interactions&lt;br /&gt;
only discriminate space and time in a binary manner as differences can&lt;br /&gt;
only be parallel or orthogonal, and can add or subtract only 100% or&lt;br /&gt;
zero, and because all differences are decomposable down to the Planck&lt;br /&gt;
action.  Events involve exchange of discrete differences between exactly&lt;br /&gt;
2 participants with no other little effects or influences one anything else.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The illusion of a continuous 3 dimensional space is very strong in the&lt;br /&gt;
human psychic.  Although orientation, for example, (polarization), only&lt;br /&gt;
manifests binary orientation, and each Plank action only discriminates&lt;br /&gt;
50% of possible space and time in a binary fashion, gazillions of events&lt;br /&gt;
together create an illusion of continuity which is contradicted by&lt;br /&gt;
experiment.  Everything we perceive on every scale is manifest by&lt;br /&gt;
quantum events and the dimensionality we perceive is limited logically,&lt;br /&gt;
not physically in a universe which is proving to have an information nature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Flat Earth Society is still around because the earth is obviously&lt;br /&gt;
flat to them, so I expect there will always be a Flat Space Society that&lt;br /&gt;
believes in continuous space.  Unfortunately the data, and thus Nature&lt;br /&gt;
herself, fails to abridge.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
[[QuantumRelativity]], [[FiniteNature]], [[WhitescarverModel]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
In http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/week202.html Baez writes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;A while back, James Dolan and I noticed that since you can use power&lt;br /&gt;
series to describe states of the quantum harmonic oscillator, you can&lt;br /&gt;
think of structure types as states of a categorified version of this&lt;br /&gt;
physical system==== This gives new insights into the combinatorial&lt;br /&gt;
====&lt;br /&gt;
underpinnings of quantum physics.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;For example, the discrete spectrum of the harmonic oscillator Hamiltonian can be traced back to the discreteness of finite sets==== The commutation relations between annihilation and creation operators boil down to a very simple fact: there&amp;#039;s one more way to put a ball in a box and then take one out, than to take one out and then put one in. Even better, the whole theory of Feynman diagrams gets a simple combinatorial interpretation.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This furthers work in http://www.arxiv.org/abs/math.QA/0004133&lt;br /&gt;
From Finite Sets to Feynman Diagrams:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;There is an inner product of stuff types that makes the category of stuff types into a categorified version of the Hilbert space of the quantized harmonic oscillator. We conclude by sketching how this idea gives a nice explanation of the combinatorics of Feynman diagrams.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This brings the relation between Schrodinger&amp;#039;s equation and the second law&lt;br /&gt;
full circle.  Systems tend to go from disorder (differences) to&lt;br /&gt;
equilibrium by undoing differences.  Schrodinger&amp;#039;s equation may be derived&lt;br /&gt;
from random samplings of any such system.  Dolan and Baez have detailed an&lt;br /&gt;
actual bridge to the structure of the orderings in the quantum which are&lt;br /&gt;
subject to this entropy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Baez &amp;quot;this week (202)&amp;quot; also details simple binary tree structures which&lt;br /&gt;
are consistent with the binary nature of discrimination, though a surreal&lt;br /&gt;
number interpretation I suspect may prove even simpler.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>imported&gt;Import</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>