<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=LawOfExceptions</id>
	<title>LawOfExceptions - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=LawOfExceptions"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?title=LawOfExceptions&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-06T15:04:23Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.45.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?title=LawOfExceptions&amp;diff=1839&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>imported&gt;Import: Imported current content</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?title=LawOfExceptions&amp;diff=1839&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-01-28T11:54:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Imported current content&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The exception proves the rule.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
There is an exception to every rule, except this rule.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
On its face, the law of exceptions is absurd according to [[ClassicalLogic]].  Yet it is indeed quite true in that even it has an exception.  In [[Truth]] the statement involves self-reference and is undecidable by Godel.  It is a good example of undecidability and perhaps a basic principle of the nature of [[Truth]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>imported&gt;Import</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>