https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3AWE 2026-05-06T15:01:58Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.45.1 https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?title=Talk:WE&diff=2285&oldid=prev 2026-01-28T11:54:25Z

<p>Imported current content</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>== Refactoring of the WE-page StarPilot == <br /> I&#039;ve refactored WE. I put Jim&#039;s opinions where they go, [[WikiWorld:About]]. But that page got confusing, so I refactored it back to its primary purpose.<br /> <br /> The [[WE]] is not Jim&#039;s handpicked lock-step collection of thoughts and opinions. That&#039;s [[WikiWorld]]. If Jim wants a good look at the [[WE]], he should go take a long week&#039;s worth of tour of 4chan. They are the [[WE]]. Fair warning though--- while they have their own visionaries that are trying to uplift the [[WE]], they are far more crass and base in their postings (both visual and textual), and if just a post from Goatse or Rotten.com would upset you, don&#039;t go near them. Those sorts of things are frequently posted as trolls and even protests against any thought or idea, particularly unpopular ones (which is frequently the truth).<br /> <br /> 2006-7-30<br /> ==== Writing on WikiWorld [[User:Alle van Meeteren|Alle van Meeteren]] ====<br /> I did not consent with the refactoring of StarPilot, and so did Jim, but he removed his text about that because he has to think longer about his reaction (see history). I added a link to [[Writing on WikiWorld]], because the description there of the way WE express ourselve. I also brought the old WE to the page StarPilot thinks the former WE-text belongs. Perhaps is it a good compromize to leave it there.<br /> <br /> I am anxious to know why 4chan forms the WE in the vision of StarPilot.<br /> <br /> 01:59, 1 August 2006 (EDT)</div>

imported>Import