imported>Import: Imported current content

2026-01-28T11:54:25Z

Imported current content

New page

=== What is the purpose of this page ===

{{extract

|extract =

[[{{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}#StarPilot 16:13, 17 July 2006 (EDT)|

1 - This page is made by Alle after a refactoring of the WE-page from the former WE-page. StarPilot asks what is the purpose of this act.

]]

[[{{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}# |

2 -

]]

[[{{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}# |

3 -

]]

[[{{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}# |

4 -

]]

|by = Alle van Meeteren

}}

=== What is the purpose of this page ===
==== [[User:Alle van Meeteren|Alle van Meeteren]] 12:24, 23 July 2006 (EDT) ====
{{tosurvey

|name = What is the purpose of this page

|namespace = {{NAMESPACE}}

|page = {{PAGENAME}}

|next =

|former =

|nr = 2

}}

StarPilot,

Your remark that the purpose of this page was unclear. I just made it to remind me of some work to do. You refactored the WE-page, but I had laid down some thoughts on that page. I was afraid I should forget to work them out, if the former WE-page was only archived as a history page.

====StarPilot 16:13, 17 July 2006 (EDT) ====
{{tosurvey

|name = What is the purpose of this page

|namespace = {{NAMESPACE}}

|page = {{PAGENAME}}

|next = Alle van Meeteren 12:24, 23 July 2006 (EDT)

|former =

|nr = 1

}}
This isn't an alternative, it was a snapshot of the page influx, and was struck down by [[ConsensusByDefault]] as unacceptable. Are you positting that there is an alternative reality and this is the Consensus, or just not confident enough in your idea of the [[WE]] page to put it back to what you think it should be? [[ConsensusByDefault]] is to change or add on to the page, not post alternatives.

Check the current [[WE]]. Is it missing a concept of the [[WE]]? It has simply been refactored. Compared to this page, the only info I can think of that is missing is the "Who am I" sidebar (which is noted in the [[WE]] page's discussion tab), but that is because that info should be refactored into its own page and discussion. Would you like to write that article? Feel free. All are welcome to add and refine at [[WikiWorld]].

So, why put this one snapshot here? What reason is it needed? And why wasn't that info added/refactored onto the [[WE]] page?

(For original page as it was created, see: http://www.wikiworld.com/wiki/index.php?title=WE_alternative&oldid=3622 )

== Another example of why [[KISS]] works better ==

Alle van Meeteren 12:24, 23 July 2006 (EDT)
StarPilot,
Your remark that the purpose of this page was unclear. I just made
it to remind me of some work to do. You refactored the WE-page, but
I had laid down some thoughts on that page. I was afraid I should
forget to work them out, if the former WE-page was only archived
as a history page.

You realize that you just gave yourself another example of why [[KISS]] works better in [[CollectiveIntelligence]], don't you? The "original" [[KISS]] page had work to be done on it that was just awaiting someone to do it, but you restyled the page and lost all that. After all the discussion and noting the lost signal, I reset the [[WE]] page to what I thought was the current consensus. Last I looked, it hadn't been reset or edited since then, but the day is still young.

So, what Idea/Work is it that you think remains here that needs to be reworked in the future?

--[[User:StarPilot|StarPilot]] 17:15, 24 July 2006 (EDT)

Talk:WE (from I and You to WE) - Revision history

imported>Import: Imported current content