<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Why_does_the_Schrodinger_equation_work%28q%29</id>
	<title>Why does the Schrodinger equation work(q) - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Why_does_the_Schrodinger_equation_work%28q%29"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?title=Why_does_the_Schrodinger_equation_work(q)&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-06T14:11:24Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.45.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?title=Why_does_the_Schrodinger_equation_work(q)&amp;diff=2260&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>imported&gt;Import: Imported current content</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?title=Why_does_the_Schrodinger_equation_work(q)&amp;diff=2260&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-01-28T11:54:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Imported current content&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122;&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;tr class=&quot;diff-title&quot; lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;←Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 11:54, 28 January 2026&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-notice&quot; lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;mw-diff-empty&quot;&gt;(No difference)&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>imported&gt;Import</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?title=Why_does_the_Schrodinger_equation_work(q)&amp;diff=2150&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>imported&gt;Import: Imported current content</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?title=Why_does_the_Schrodinger_equation_work(q)&amp;diff=2150&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-01-28T11:54:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Imported current content&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;patrick&amp;quot; &amp;lt;networkone@eircom.net&amp;gt; wrote in message news:&amp;lt;S4dV9.3059$V6.4841@news.indigo.ie&amp;gt;...&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; hello,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt;    Why does the Schrodinger equation work?&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; The only clue from QM books is that solutions to it are plane waves...these&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; being de Broglie matter waves. There are other diff equations whose&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; solutions are plane waves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interesting question.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Something interesting to consider.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You probably heard of the continuity equation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
d/dx( v * p ) +  d/dt( p ) = 0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where p is probability at each instant of time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and v is the velocity of probability current.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Suppose, v is contant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A continuity converses total p . i,e&lt;br /&gt;
if int_(x&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;-infty,x&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;infty) p(x) dx = 1, it will remain 1, at each&lt;br /&gt;
instant of time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, suppose, p randomly happens to be, at instant time t=0,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p(0) = a_0 cos( k * x)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
it will stay in this wave shape forever.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
consider p = a_0 cos( k*x - wt + theta)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 d/dx( v cos( k &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; x  - wt + theta ) ) + d/dt( cos( k &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; x - wt  +&lt;br /&gt;
theta)) = 0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  v &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; k [[ -sin (k &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; x - wt +theta) ]] - w [[ - sin(k *x - wt + theta) ]]&lt;br /&gt;
=0&lt;br /&gt;
  v *k = w&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, if a wave magically happened to start with the form&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p = a_0 cos( k * x + theta )&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
it will stay in that shape forever.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[side note: There are problems with this approach, because cos(x) is&lt;br /&gt;
not normalizable.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even more interesting is an interesting property of fourier&lt;br /&gt;
transforms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Almost]] any physically possible function can be decomposed into a&lt;br /&gt;
bunch of sinusoid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, if  p  starts with&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p = sum&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n a&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n cos( k_n * x + theta)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
it will stays as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p = sum&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n a&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n cos( k&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; x + theta + k&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; v * t)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
forever.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, even if the phenomenon did not magically start as a wave, it will&lt;br /&gt;
evolve like one ,which is all and all a curious property of the&lt;br /&gt;
continuity equation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; One would imagine some simple physical model is the basis of the plane&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; waves.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; It is strange no such model has been found.(The various interterpretations&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; dont seem to give any simple practical model.)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; The obvious question: the Bohr model is simple. It is too near to being&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; correct to be&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; pure coincidence. Why that coincidence.?&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; patrick&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
It turns out that the Schrodinger equation emerges from random population sampling, like when you sample 100 people out of 1000, find one with a desease, and assume there will be 10 in the total population.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Too bad I can&amp;#039;t finds the reference to the proof.  The article was discussed somewhere on yahoo i believe last year.  This was an important finding.  -- [[JimScarver]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>imported&gt;Import</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>