<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=WikiPageLineage</id>
	<title>WikiPageLineage - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=WikiPageLineage"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?title=WikiPageLineage&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-06T14:14:04Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.45.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?title=WikiPageLineage&amp;diff=2169&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>imported&gt;Import: Imported current content</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wikiworld.com/index.php?title=WikiPageLineage&amp;diff=2169&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-01-28T11:54:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Imported current content&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Every Wiki page must have an authorship lineage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The page orginator for a time must be the primary author.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This can change if less than 50% of the original page remains.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The primary authour is consulted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each Wiki link has a owner, the primary author of that page title.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They are consulted in turn. Purely for the removal of a link.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
I don&amp;#039;t get it?  This seems anti-wiki.  Email notifications of page modifications would be a nice features, but if you dont like a chage someone make you just change it back (edit old version, copy and paste into new edit).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
This is not an automatic machine feature here. It is a human communication issue. In order to proceed I feel courtesy needs to be employed to allow reasonable edits to be made.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AnewGoErasureAct]] is for edits the user feels will be non-contentious, or has a lot of backup if it is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AnewGoMajorEditAct]] is for negotiated Edits, and therefore the page lineage needs some attention.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
True wiki would imply this is unecessary, but eventually pages will be modified that i may not see for months or even years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may be able to be automated in the future.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
This is two different concerns (ideas) battling here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Wiki, it doesn&amp;#039;t matter WHO authored the page. Anyone can add, modify, or delete on that page. There is some courtesy extended (people do not do complete refactoring on other people&amp;#039;s home pages), but still...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[AnewGo]], [[AnewGo]] is concerned that serious [[AnewGo]] pages are not editted beyond their original intent/meaning, and therefore show a bunch of [[AnewGoCitizens]] signing up for &amp;#039;The Protection of the Amazon Rain Forest&amp;#039; have it changed to state: We think: [[BushIsAnIdiot]]!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, here at [[WikiWorld]], we always have a tag as to who did what to a page, but... as we work on the Honor system for logins, there is no guarantee that it really was [[StarPilot]] that made that change/edit, even though the tag says [[StarPilot]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is a simple conflict between ease of use and confidentiality, versus the need for hard ownership and audit trails. ---[[StarPilot]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
(Note: This page was part of an old conversation concerning [[AnewGo]] processes.)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>imported&gt;Import</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>