ManifestDestiny

This is an open question for all you information physicists out there. We say that an electron is two bits - one for charge, and one for spin. It's also been said that each of the two bits belongs to a binary differential whose other half lies elsewhere (in a positron?). This alone would make sense to me, but I've also been told that 'photons' are really groups of binary differentials.

 'it is not certain that an electron is only two bits or two BinaryDifferential poles.  What is certain is that it has two discrete variables or dimensions which can take any integral value depending on your relative motion with respect to it.  At the lowest energy it has a 50% chance of manifesting zero or one binary difference.'

Photons propagate as possibilities ('virtual particles') along an 'event cone' until such time as they encounter the right electron. When an electron is hit by a photon (excuse the term photon), it jumps to a higher ('or lower') energy level. This can also be described as an electron exclusion event, but the point is that we say the electron has received a number of binary differentials, and therefore it's average distance from the nucleus increases.

 'actually, it is a state change of some discrete number of states in two dimensions, distorted by relative motion, that is received if the new electron state, as changed, is unoccupied.'

Yet we still say that an electron is two bits. Conceptually, I am unable to grasp that the key player, the electron, is only two bits, but the 'energy' that boosts it is many bits -- especially since the quantum physicists say that electrons are heavier than most 'photons.'

 'think two half binary differentials manifesting two discrete dimensions.'

Could it be that, while an electron is only two bits, the information that determines or consists the electron's path, i.e. its probability curve or Heisenberg equation or whatever, is what really contains a lot of information, since, hey, a path is just as good a notion as any. If this is the case, it won't be so hard for me to understand anymore. You have electron A in a high orbit following a path consisting of many binary differentials, and the secret of the electron and its energy manifests across the event cone until encountering electron B, which incorporates the binary differentials into its own orbit, taking them away from electron A. I'll also note that, regardless of distance, this is an electron exclusion event, and can easily be described as two electrons bumping into one another and exchanging a photon. I'll also concede that, from a certain perspective, on might see the binary differentials going from B to A instead. In the end, though, I'd like for us to build a clearer binary differential model for electron exclusion events, the atom, 'energy,' and zpe. Thoughts?

-OutRadulous

BinaryDifferentials are minimal distinguishable differences. Bits, on the other hand, are information with respect to a sender and receiver. Binary differentials manifest a single discrete dimension consisting of two end points that may be perceived to be of any length, manifesting any number of bits.

I often try to simplify things by describing them in terms of electron exclusions only. But when talking about photon (state change information) interactions with matter it is both the excluded interations and the failures to exclude that manifest reality. It is not allowed (doesn't happen) to change the state of an electron such that it occupies the same state as another electron of the same spin. 'Both propagate information into the future, excluded interations across space manifest by the event, non-excluded at a place/object independence of the participants manifest by the event. Non excluded photon interations are equivalent to what i call electron exclusions over a distance as opposed to interal exclusions in the receiver.PLEASE RESTATE WHAT I'VE PUT IN BOLD -O' --> how about: Virtual particles manifesting ZPE are generatited when no actual interaction is allowed/possible which generate space. Eventually one of the generated virtual particles generate along the light path finds an actual object that absorbs its state change because it is not forbidden. The imbalance or internal change is compensated for in internal interactions until it can by balanced by accepting opposing external changes.

Atoms are a conspiracy of the parts, or binary differentials, that they are composed of. Three independent binary differentials manifest three independent binary dimensions. If allowed, binary differentials annihilate themselves. The difference recombines into the nothingness from which it came. This annihilation, however, represents an opposite change, manifesting an opposite differential with the potential of oscillating forever if the change is witnessed in interactions with other differentials.

Three binary differentials, forming a basic tetrahedron, might tail chase forever, each manifest by the other two oscillating in turn reacting to the change of its neighbor 'UNCLEAR' (think of three magnets balanced horizontally hanging from strings at the same height in a triangle where they can spin but not touch. spin one, as it lines up with one of the other two the dominate and spin the third, or think of an electric motor with three armetures). This corresponds to the tetrahedra structure of matter Buckminster Fuller identified from the standard model of the quantum.

The three differential system, however, is apparently not stable. Measurement of a four dimensional quantum space space implies there must be at least four differentials forming a hypertetrahedron. This hypertetrahedron can be thought of as having an inner tetrahedron and an outer tetrahedron. The inner dimension explains a lot about the nature of matter. The inside events are not witnessed by the outside world leaving the state of the inner world an uncertainty and manifesting only our three familiar dimensions externally. The internal, hidden interactions generate internal space only.

This, however, is still not complete. The four differentials might still be easily unraveled by random interaction with external differentials such as are in the zpe. Each external quantum state may be occupied by two electrons of opposite spin, spin comprising a fifth differential. Internally, there is a corresponding state of opposite charge, a sixth differential.

In any case, looking at the hydrogen atom, the proton manifests two dimensions, with two more external dimensions manifest (electron), and two corresponding unseen internal dimensions, in a logical structure that is so stable it apparently never decays. The two internal and two external dimensions are, in actuality, the same two dimensions manifest in two different contexts.

Understanding how these binary differentials interact to hide the internal state from all interaction and manifest itself forever is our challenge. It is a challenge similar to that facing science 50 years ago in unraveling the structure of DNA.

There are a number of ways to think about these stable knotted alternating differentials that effectively trap the two internal and external differential segments, locking the external charge and spin out and the internal charge and spin in by deception.

Binary differences can add or annihilate if aligned in the same macro dimension. There is no such thing as absolute alignment, it is a perception. We can consider the binary dimension to fold into six dimensions.

If we think of 3 dimensions folding to the left and 3 folding to the right, tangled much like the old bent nail puzzle [1] we see that a state change in three dimensions is required to unravel it. Since only two dimensions are exposed, it is incapable of undoing any other atom.

A more accurate model has two outer spikes and two inner wells, state changes, introduced from outside, oscillate between the two inner wells until there is an opportunity to annihilate the state change in an external interaction.

-JimScarver

See HyperHelixStructureOfMatter