====Electromagnetism

==

2 dimensional electrons manifest a constant charge and a relative spin manifesting a sort of overlapping up space and down space. Two dimension is insufficient to define a three dimensional position. Two electrons however are capable of occupying a state in a four dimensional space. The charge and spin dimension of each is linked respectively to a positive charge and opposite spin dimension internal to the object. The two dimensional electron convey only state change information in two dimensions, not absolute state values. If we align electron spin, as in a magnet, creating an imbalance, we in effect define the absence of populated states. The definition (manifestation) of three dimensional space requires that electrons of opposite spin occupy the same state. Two objects, with a predominance of spin aligned in one direction are unable to populate the state space defining the space between them, resulting in the contraction of space we call magnetic attraction, opposite spins define state space manifesting expansion of state space or repulsion. If we have excess similar charge in two objects they define more space and repel. It we have opposite charge they are unable to populate the state space defining the space between them, resulting in the contraction of space, or attraction.

The population or evacuation of a state by an electron, manifests a change in charge and a change in spin in that state. As we see in semiconductor physics, the absence of an electron (electron hole) has equivalent properties to a positron. There are two equivalent perspectives. Which is manifest depends on the perspective of the receiver.

See TruthAboutLight

more coming here soon....goto run

Ok... so there cannot be 3D space if you have a collection of mostly the same spinning electrons? Er... if that's true, then there wouldn't be anything there at all==== So that means that you do not get a locality/place where opposing spin is welcomed/attracted/sticky! So that means that your statement needs clarification. We have 3D space with magnetically strong areas. So therefore, it seems you can have 3D space regardless of which orientation spinning electrons have.

==

I look forward to your clarifications and further detailing.

---StarPilot

Occupied states are solids, not space, 2D signals, light, across time manifest 3D space. Up electron interactions manifest up space, while down electrons manifest down space. Note that up and down is not really a good analogy, turning a magnet over has no effect while turning it around lengthwise does. in and out space, or male and female space are a better analogy where there is no gay light cohabiting states. :) But left handed and right handed may be even better since there is nothing really in or out either. In the information model we just say there is a one bit directed property with two possible values. We don't really care how that value is interpreted.

Where there is a predominance of up spin in one direction there is a predominance of up space being defined in that direction. But that is balanced by a predominance of down space being defined in the opposite direction. This create opposite flows of up space and down space. The rate of this flow anomaly is inversely related to distance. The total effect still balances to define 3D space for materials that are agnostic with respect to spin. They are pushed more one way by up space but they are pushed more the other way by down space so that the total net effect is zero. The alternate flow of up space and down space is only apparent when a magnetic materials commute the spin anomaly.

Just as space is manifest between like magnet poles when they repel and they tend to spin around and define zero space between there opposite poles manifesting attraction, so do the individual electrons in magnetic material line up and appear to attract one another by occupying the same state while commuting the spin anomaly.

Electrons are little magnets showing how magnetism really works. like spins are excluded from like states and reflect each other by exchanging momentums. Unlike spins happily cohabitate the same state manifesting zero space between them. Large magnets defined by lots of electrons of like spin show the same effect on a larger scale by the addition of all the effects of all the individual electrons.

--JimScarver

I don't know Jim. Everything is information. So, if everything is ultimately quantum bits of some form, then even a classic "solid" is merely a very dense information state point/structure. Instead of a solitary electron, it is trillions of electrons (and all the complex structures of information built into that particular solid). Now, if magnetism is simply another parallel information layer, then I understand how we have magnetic North and South dominate space. However, it seems odd to me that a small range of solids are magnetically sensitive. Most dense information structures are magnetically insensitive, after all (and they ignore magnetic local variations unless the variation is so strong as to be able to affect the minor inborn magnetic charges of the object in question).

From what you said, it seems that you are implying that it takes an up and down spin to get zero spin space. But if up and down space are separate spaces (they ignore each other), then you have 2 information layers that just happen to overlay each other in our physical observations. This seems to be the logically consistent synthesis of the observations/facts that up spin exclude only up spin, and down spin exclude only down spin, and they otherwise ignore all else. You'd have the emergent behavior you call zero spin space due to up spin information coming to rest in what we observers call "down spin" space, because there is a lack of up spin to exclude other magnetic up spins. And visa versa. This isn't so much an attraction as it is a push pressure... there is less of an exclusion "pressure" type force from the opposite spin dominated areas, ergo the spin oriented bits end up going there and bringing its observed spin sum to "zero". Is that what you are saying? If so, then it seems to me that magnetism doesn't define 3D space at all... it overlies regular space. Unless you are claiming 3D space itself is actually a magnetic spin agnostic occuraoccurrenceat 3D space only occurs where any magnetic information resides? Are you are saying that any magnetic spin (any up or down, which obviously includes balanced/zero sum spin space as it has both) is the base layer that all other information transports (and therefore, builds) on?

---StarPilot

I am saying that only events happening now exist, by application of quantum operators (virtual positron-electron chain etc.) in units of Planck actions, of propagating differences, events are manifest as energy, momentum exchanges between like spin electrons, manifesting state in solid objects or mass, and the vacuum soup where differences propagate differences by deterministic clockwork if state change rate propagations. Spacetime is distinguished by differentials of time and space of the virtual states as velocities, the masses and spacetime velocities independently both manifest the momentum exchanges between the electrons as the mass distinguish times the velocity distinguished, propagating and thereby manifesting both matter and energy. The velocity component of the momentum is the spacetime interval defines a change in velocities, technically an acceleration. It is because events manifest velocities, not positions, that generating or losing events result in accelerations and that space conserves velocities.

Velocities are the stacetime component result of all interactions but they event is gone as soon as it ocurrs. There are no withnesses to quantum events except the two participant states (state change rate of the two electron states) But the velocity thus manifest is preserved in the orderings of event propagation by the nonlinear quantum operators. Position is not manifest logically, only relative orderings and velocity.

Everything in the quantum (quantum operations) moves only at the speed of light. Masses simple move every which way such that the velocity vectors, all at the speed of light, add to zero in some rest frame. The relative imbalace of these velocities manifests ordinary velocities of the masses. The propogations porogate eachother like clockwork.

The bits are not points, they are lines, one dimensional binary distinctions from nothingness universally propagating differences by logical interactions which manifest binary and integer states when they are stable, e.g. matter, and generally tend toward equilibrium as energy flows from high to low as statistically shown by Schrodinger's equation. Matter consists of stable clocked systems because it mimicks nothingness by having all differences cancel to zero externally, while the differences interact secretly internally.

All of the events that manifest spacetime reflect velocities manifest by momentum exchanges between electrons of like spin. This effect is obvious when two up spin ends of magnets repel each other or opposite spin electrons, of opposite polls fail to define spacetime velocities between each other.

--JimScarver