Jump to content

DearDiary.2005-08-08

From WikiWorld

DearDiary,

Here is a continuation of discussion from IntegerEnergy

%%%jimscarver : infophysics is nature of information and infoemation of physics, information systems model of the universe.
%%%jimscarver : i have writen much material in those places
%%%jimscarver : and I think we can collaborate on book using wikiworld
%%%jimscarver : are you strong in mathimatics? we should have collaborator good in discrete math to help formalization.
%%%jimscarver : brb
%%%jimscarver : my connection was lost, i will resend my question
%%%jimscarver : are you strong in mathimatics? we should have collaborator good in discrete math to help formalization.
%%%jimscarver : i know you are extremely intelligent
%%%jimscarver : unfortunately I start work this week and do not have much time.
%%%jimscarver : may it be so.
%%%jimscarver : i do not know
%%%jimscarver : today i am seeking good mathimatical framework
%%%http://wikiworld.com/RelativeIntegerDifferenceCalculus
%%%jimscarver : need to relate infophysics to quantum gravity model of Seth Lloyd or Cahill
%%%jimscarver : to show it gets correct answers
%%%jimscarver : did you see my questions and answers about the neutrino?
%%%jimscarver : that is a promising area for making predictions that future experiment will prove
%%%jimscarver : neutrino is basic componant of everything, it is a single vector potential
%%%jimscarver : half of a degree of freedom
%%%jimscarver : and many experiments are planned.
%%%jimscarver : yes, equivalents to Lloyd or Cahil will show gravity model works
%%%jimscarver : quantum theory fails to tell story of neutrino, so that is where we can make new predictions
%%%jimscarver : there is much to be written already, but more to learn too.
%%%jimscarver : it is rotation due to orthogonal folding
%%%jimscarver : which is relative, itself is just alternation
%%%jimscarver : um, no exactly, confused again...
%%%jimscarver : yes, orientation independent
%%%jimscarver : it lacks two dimensions, neutrino and anti-neutrino may not really be different.
%%%jimscarver : true
%%%jimscarver : average aggragate
%%%jimscarver : net effect of many events
%%%jimscarver : einstein shown magnetic is relative effect of electric, closer to truth is electric is average effect of magnetic, electron cannot be both magnet and charge.
%%%jimscarver : opposite spin electrons cannot interact as they occupy same state without conflict
%%%jimscarver : force is due to momentum exchange due to manifesting independent state
%%%jimscarver : such that momentum as different relatively
%%%jimscarver : I have seen in many experiments and in theory that electrons of opposite spin do not interact but many still think the opposite is true or it does not matter, i need undenyable support for this position
%%%jimscarver : it implies that photons and antiphoton spins DO NOT ADD ONE and each has half spin.
%%%jimscarver : thank you
%%%jimscarver : i wish to not be alone in this, i am glad you can share this understanding
%%%jimscarver : quantum theory already has answers, except for neutrino
%%%jimscarver : i had good teachers who helped me understand what quantum theory means will happen.  this understanding seems beyond most scientists understanding, though i make stupid mistakes often also.
%%%jimscarver : but at least i can see mistake...
%%%jimscarver : eventually
%%%jimscarver : Mead's collective electrodynamics is very good also
%%%jimscarver : i need to understand it better, have you read it?
%%%jimscarver : it has helped me to express things
%%%jimscarver : hum, reading Mead, Cramer, Lloyd and Cahil would help a lot since we can build on their work
%%%jimscarver : we will need collaborator who knows these
%%%jimscarver : http://wikiworld.com/DiscreteRelativity
%%%jimscarver : I can wait to see if infophysics gets same answer
%%%jimscarver : only natural units in infophysics, c<code>1, hbar</code>1, ...
%%%jimscarver : Cahill and Lloyd have gravity correct.
%%%jimscarver : each is not completely satisfactory to me, but each confirms my model
%%%jimscarver : need to design experiment to show photon spin, or identify existing proof
%%%jimscarver : half spin forward in time -1/2 backward in time
%%%jimscarver : equivalent to virtual electron positron collective propagation
%%%jimscarver : so up electron interacts with up electron only by "up photon"
%%%jimscarver : this is important to show as true
%%%jimscarver : photon with direction in time is half spin
%%%jimscarver : experimental and theoretical verification
%%%jimscarver : i cannot do the math for things i have done the math for many years ago
%%%jimscarver : i have several metaphysical analogies, i need to show quantum mechanics says so and experiment says so.
%%%jimscarver : to defeat wrong notions of light
%%%jimscarver : nobody cares unless you can make new predictions
%%%jimscarver : and that use the standard model to prove you wrong
%%%jimscarver : they use
%%%jimscarver : at some point the standard model must be shown to be in error or it cannot be replaced
%%%jimscarver : if we can explain it well enough it may be heard...
%%%jimscarver : but i have seen many formula that describe gravity, the fornula alone is not enough
%%%jimscarver : putnam(?) also had nice formula more than a decade ago
%%%jimscarver : i have model of universe
%%%jimscarver : just info model
%%%jimscarver : i have different names i use, discrete relativity is one
%%%jimscarver : binary relativity
%%%jimscarver : everything is made dynamically by Plank actions, a binary difference
%%%jimscarver : a binary distinction which discriminates a binary distinction
%%%jimscarver : existence is only what is being discriminated now.
%%%jimscarver : i have no primitive forces, all emerge from dicriminations
%%%jimscarver : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/InfoPhysics/message/4437
%%%jimscarver : yes
%%%jimscarver : vacuum energy
%%%jimscarver : i do not understand, i account for dark energy as vacuum energy, energy is discrete momentum exchange.
%%%jimscarver : it equal in all directions you get newton's gravity, but not equal in galactic plane
%%%jimscarver : energy is 2 dimensional, not sphere
%%%jimscarver : lateral and transverse only
%%%jimscarver : any two orthogonal in just one direction (vector) each for each participant
%%%jimscarver : universe is like a deformed disk
%%%jimscarver : the lasger the mass, the more vacuum it can receive
%%%jimscarver : larger
%%%jimscarver : like a radio receiver
%%%jimscarver : the line between push (high) and pull (low) gets lower
%%%jimscarver : all momentum exchane and thus all acceleration is energy release (expansion) and reception (contyraction/gravity)
%%%jimscarver : gleon?  just ordinary low frequency energy manifest eather
%%%jimscarver : no waves are fundimental, not even sound or water waves, underneath is discrete kinetics
%%%jimscarver : everything we withness is exchange of photons between electrons
%%%jimscarver : photon=momentum exchange via virtual electron-positron kinetics
%%%jimscarver : vacuum energy comes from early universe in the proportion we would expect
%%%jimscarver : http://www.whitescarver.com/gallery/InfoPhysics/ZPE vacuum energy shown in green
%%%jimscarver : it was very high energy that has red shifted
%%%jimscarver : energy of one Plank action is beginning of this information epoch of the universe
%%%jimscarver : all energy is neutrinos, two crossed neutrinos are light/electron/positrons
%%%jimscarver : all is red shifted
%%%jimscarver : wavelength of Plank action energy is our distance from appearent big bang, frequency of Plank action energy is inverse of appearent age of universe
%%%jimscarver : that os info cosmology
%%%jimscarver : is
%%%jimscarver : beginning