DearDiary.2005-08-08
Appearance
Here is a continuation of discussion from IntegerEnergy
%%%jimscarver : infophysics is nature of information and infoemation of physics, information systems model of the universe. %%%jimscarver : i have writen much material in those places %%%jimscarver : and I think we can collaborate on book using wikiworld %%%jimscarver : are you strong in mathimatics? we should have collaborator good in discrete math to help formalization. %%%jimscarver : brb %%%jimscarver : my connection was lost, i will resend my question %%%jimscarver : are you strong in mathimatics? we should have collaborator good in discrete math to help formalization. %%%jimscarver : i know you are extremely intelligent %%%jimscarver : unfortunately I start work this week and do not have much time. %%%jimscarver : may it be so. %%%jimscarver : i do not know %%%jimscarver : today i am seeking good mathimatical framework %%%http://wikiworld.com/RelativeIntegerDifferenceCalculus %%%jimscarver : need to relate infophysics to quantum gravity model of Seth Lloyd or Cahill %%%jimscarver : to show it gets correct answers %%%jimscarver : did you see my questions and answers about the neutrino? %%%jimscarver : that is a promising area for making predictions that future experiment will prove %%%jimscarver : neutrino is basic componant of everything, it is a single vector potential %%%jimscarver : half of a degree of freedom %%%jimscarver : and many experiments are planned. %%%jimscarver : yes, equivalents to Lloyd or Cahil will show gravity model works %%%jimscarver : quantum theory fails to tell story of neutrino, so that is where we can make new predictions %%%jimscarver : there is much to be written already, but more to learn too. %%%jimscarver : it is rotation due to orthogonal folding %%%jimscarver : which is relative, itself is just alternation %%%jimscarver : um, no exactly, confused again... %%%jimscarver : yes, orientation independent %%%jimscarver : it lacks two dimensions, neutrino and anti-neutrino may not really be different. %%%jimscarver : true %%%jimscarver : average aggragate %%%jimscarver : net effect of many events %%%jimscarver : einstein shown magnetic is relative effect of electric, closer to truth is electric is average effect of magnetic, electron cannot be both magnet and charge. %%%jimscarver : opposite spin electrons cannot interact as they occupy same state without conflict %%%jimscarver : force is due to momentum exchange due to manifesting independent state %%%jimscarver : such that momentum as different relatively %%%jimscarver : I have seen in many experiments and in theory that electrons of opposite spin do not interact but many still think the opposite is true or it does not matter, i need undenyable support for this position %%%jimscarver : it implies that photons and antiphoton spins DO NOT ADD ONE and each has half spin. %%%jimscarver : thank you %%%jimscarver : i wish to not be alone in this, i am glad you can share this understanding %%%jimscarver : quantum theory already has answers, except for neutrino %%%jimscarver : i had good teachers who helped me understand what quantum theory means will happen. this understanding seems beyond most scientists understanding, though i make stupid mistakes often also. %%%jimscarver : but at least i can see mistake... %%%jimscarver : eventually %%%jimscarver : Mead's collective electrodynamics is very good also %%%jimscarver : i need to understand it better, have you read it? %%%jimscarver : it has helped me to express things %%%jimscarver : hum, reading Mead, Cramer, Lloyd and Cahil would help a lot since we can build on their work %%%jimscarver : we will need collaborator who knows these %%%jimscarver : http://wikiworld.com/DiscreteRelativity %%%jimscarver : I can wait to see if infophysics gets same answer %%%jimscarver : only natural units in infophysics, c<code>1, hbar</code>1, ... %%%jimscarver : Cahill and Lloyd have gravity correct. %%%jimscarver : each is not completely satisfactory to me, but each confirms my model %%%jimscarver : need to design experiment to show photon spin, or identify existing proof %%%jimscarver : half spin forward in time -1/2 backward in time %%%jimscarver : equivalent to virtual electron positron collective propagation %%%jimscarver : so up electron interacts with up electron only by "up photon" %%%jimscarver : this is important to show as true %%%jimscarver : photon with direction in time is half spin %%%jimscarver : experimental and theoretical verification %%%jimscarver : i cannot do the math for things i have done the math for many years ago %%%jimscarver : i have several metaphysical analogies, i need to show quantum mechanics says so and experiment says so. %%%jimscarver : to defeat wrong notions of light %%%jimscarver : nobody cares unless you can make new predictions %%%jimscarver : and that use the standard model to prove you wrong %%%jimscarver : they use %%%jimscarver : at some point the standard model must be shown to be in error or it cannot be replaced %%%jimscarver : if we can explain it well enough it may be heard... %%%jimscarver : but i have seen many formula that describe gravity, the fornula alone is not enough %%%jimscarver : putnam(?) also had nice formula more than a decade ago %%%jimscarver : i have model of universe %%%jimscarver : just info model %%%jimscarver : i have different names i use, discrete relativity is one %%%jimscarver : binary relativity %%%jimscarver : everything is made dynamically by Plank actions, a binary difference %%%jimscarver : a binary distinction which discriminates a binary distinction %%%jimscarver : existence is only what is being discriminated now. %%%jimscarver : i have no primitive forces, all emerge from dicriminations %%%jimscarver : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/InfoPhysics/message/4437 %%%jimscarver : yes %%%jimscarver : vacuum energy %%%jimscarver : i do not understand, i account for dark energy as vacuum energy, energy is discrete momentum exchange. %%%jimscarver : it equal in all directions you get newton's gravity, but not equal in galactic plane %%%jimscarver : energy is 2 dimensional, not sphere %%%jimscarver : lateral and transverse only %%%jimscarver : any two orthogonal in just one direction (vector) each for each participant %%%jimscarver : universe is like a deformed disk %%%jimscarver : the lasger the mass, the more vacuum it can receive %%%jimscarver : larger %%%jimscarver : like a radio receiver %%%jimscarver : the line between push (high) and pull (low) gets lower %%%jimscarver : all momentum exchane and thus all acceleration is energy release (expansion) and reception (contyraction/gravity) %%%jimscarver : gleon? just ordinary low frequency energy manifest eather %%%jimscarver : no waves are fundimental, not even sound or water waves, underneath is discrete kinetics %%%jimscarver : everything we withness is exchange of photons between electrons %%%jimscarver : photon=momentum exchange via virtual electron-positron kinetics %%%jimscarver : vacuum energy comes from early universe in the proportion we would expect %%%jimscarver : http://www.whitescarver.com/gallery/InfoPhysics/ZPE vacuum energy shown in green %%%jimscarver : it was very high energy that has red shifted %%%jimscarver : energy of one Plank action is beginning of this information epoch of the universe %%%jimscarver : all energy is neutrinos, two crossed neutrinos are light/electron/positrons %%%jimscarver : all is red shifted %%%jimscarver : wavelength of Plank action energy is our distance from appearent big bang, frequency of Plank action energy is inverse of appearent age of universe %%%jimscarver : that os info cosmology %%%jimscarver : is %%%jimscarver : beginning