Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary

SovereignIndividuals have the right to rebel against any government that violates their basic human rights.

WE do not subscribe to war as a reasonable means of resolving dispute. The pen IS mightier than the sword in a civilized world.

WE do see non-cooperation as the duty of a citizen when is comes to government violation of our SocialContract.

WE seek not to be subscribed into battle nor have war brought to our homes. To this end, we support all international efforts to make war fruitless.

WE will die if need be to preserve our freedom but make every effort to see that no one is slain when ever possible.

-- Citizens of AnewGo:

JimScarver

Pardon me. Ken, those "We" are not of the WE. It is a smaller group, not the entire CollectiveIntelligence of Humanity. Jim is making as statement on what he believes in, and is encouraging others to pledge the same thing. But I do not believe he is making a claim on the current state of what all Humanity believes.

Pardon me. Star, WE are the emerging collective intelligence, not the lies we thought were true. I was hesitant to use WE as the case that these are more intelligent than alternative views has not been made. They seem intelligent to Kenny and myself anyway so I made them WE again. Perhaps you can reword them to make mesh better with your views of what the more intelligent approach is, or vioce your specific objections.

Jim, from the reading of this page, I took it that your "WE" was not the WE of the total CollectiveIntelligence. It was the smaller "WE" that you spoke about on War, in stating what you found acceptable and reasonable, and what you and those you would call friend, do not. A different SocialCollective then the all inclusive of the WE. Unless I misunderstand what the WE is, and not what you (and sometimes I) would like to make it?

I am talking specifically about the CollectiveIntelligence WE who apply object criteia to develope group problem solutions that are at least as good as the best individual solution, not the lowest common denominator we acting out collective stupidity.

 Ah==== Now I see! So sometimes when you say WE, you mean all of the HumanCollective, and other times, you mean the smaller groups that you join or form to discuss matters in. That's very distinct groups. The HumanCollective is always the CollectiveStupidity. And that is what I tend to bring up and stick your logical proprositions on... how to get the CollectiveStupidity to buy into your ideals or proprosals. ---StarPilot