Jump to content

Why does the Schrodinger equation work?

From WikiWorld

"patrick" <networkone@eircom.net> wrote in message news:<S4dV9.3059$V6.4841@news.indigo.ie>...
> hello,
>
> Why does the Schrodinger equation work?
> The only clue from QM books is that solutions to it are plane waves...these
> being de Broglie matter waves. There are other diff equations whose
> solutions are plane waves.

Interesting question.

Something interesting to consider.

You probably heard of the continuity equation.

d/dx( v * p ) + d/dt( p ) = 0

where p is probability at each instant of time.

and v is the velocity of probability current.

Suppose, v is contant.


A continuity converses total p . i,e if int_(x=-infty,x=infty) p(x) dx = 1, it will remain 1, at each instant of time.

Now, suppose, p randomly happens to be, at instant time t=0,

p(0) = a_0 cos( k * x)

it will stay in this wave shape forever.

consider p = a_0 cos( k*x - wt + theta)

d/dx( v cos( k * x - wt + theta ) ) + d/dt( cos( k * x - wt + theta)) = 0

v * k (-sin (k * x - wt +theta) ) - w ( - sin(k *x - wt + theta) ) =0

v *k = w

So, if a wave magically happened to start with the form

p = a_0 cos( k * x + theta )

it will stay in that shape forever.

[side note: There are problems with this approach, because cos(x) is not normalizable.]

Even more interesting is an interesting property of fourier transforms.

Almost any physically possible function can be decomposed into a bunch of sinusoid.

So, if p starts with

p = sum_n a_n cos( k_n * x + theta)

it will stays as

p = sum_n a_n cos( k_n * x + theta + k_n * v * t)

forever.

So, even if the phenomenon did not magically start as a wave, it will evolve like one ,which is all and all a curious property of the continuity equation.

>
> One would imagine some simple physical model is the basis of the plane
> waves.
> It is strange no such model has been found.(The various interterpretations
> dont seem to give any simple practical model.)
>
> The obvious question: the Bohr model is simple. It is too near to being
> correct to be
> pure coincidence. Why that coincidence.?
>
> patrick


It turns out that the Schrodinger equation emerges from random population sampling, like when you sample 100 people out of 1000, find one with a desease, and assume there will be 10 in the total population.

Too bad I can't finds the reference to the proof. The article was discussed somewhere on yahoo i believe last year. This was an important finding. -- JimScarver